The board of Deep Springs College voted August 31, 2017 to open applications to women for the 2018 entering class. The board adopted the recommendation of the college’s Coeducation Transition Committee, which read: “Having reviewed the preparation needs for admitting women in the summer of 2018, the planning structure, agenda, and the institutional resources in place to address them, the transition committee recommends to the Board of Deep Springs College that the college welcome applications from all promising young people for the incoming class of 2018.”

Deep Springs has operated for a century with an all-male student body; this vote culminates a process begun by the Board’s 2011 resolution that having “carefully considered the purpose of Deep Springs, how best to achieve the purpose, and changes in society since the college was created, the trustees determine that it is appropriate to plan and implement a transition to a coeducational student body.”

The college plans to post the 2018 application to its website on September 5, 2017: https://www.deepsprings.edu/admissions/

Questions about coeducation: coedadmissionsquestions@deepsprings.edu

Press inquiries about coeducation: pressinquiries@deepsprings.edu

Be it resolved that the Trustees of Deep Springs College acknowledge, appreciate, and applaud the June 28th California Supreme court decision not to change the California 4th District Court of Appeal’s affirmation of the Trial Court order to amend the L. L. Nunn Trust to serve all promising young people, not men only. By refusing to entertain further appeal, the Supreme Court has confirmed and empowered the 2011 Trustees’ decision to admit women to Deep Springs College.

The Trustees of Deep Springs are confident that Deep Springs College can and should implement a smooth transition to coeducation as soon as practicable. Further, the Trustees of Deep Springs College commit to work enthusiastically and in unison to support coeducation at Deep Springs College. As a body, the Trustees ask the alumni and friends of Deep Springs to join the college in supporting this endeavor.

The Trustees are also very grateful to all of those who have devoted their time, energy, and resources to achieve this result. The steadiness of this support has been an inspiration. The Trustees also thank the legal team and college counsel for their extensive labor in behalf of the Trustees’ decision, including lawyers and staff from Baker Manock & Jensen, Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer, and Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton.

(Passed unanimously on August 14, 2017)

Coeducation: Is it Possible in 2018?

The Trustees are pleased that the California Supreme Court decided not to review our case. This clears the way for coeducation at Deep Springs. The trust can now be modified to read, “for the education of promising young people.”

The litigation was long and sometimes frustrating. Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that a debate spanning five decades should take a handful of years in court. I am proud of the Deep Springs community. The tone during our listening sessions, back in 2011, was calmer, more reflective, and more collaborative than the stories I heard from the seventies and nineties. The mood at the Centennial Reunion was upbeat and happy. Whatever their original feelings on the topic, I think most people are glad to have this controversy behind us. I got a warm hug from Ed Keonjian at the reunion. It’s time for all of us to come together.

Thank you to everyone who participated in listening sessions, gave advice, or supported the process in any way. Thanks also to the legal team that so ably represented us, including lawyers and staff from Baker Manock & Jensen, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.

At the Centennial, many people asked if we could go coed in 2018, a year from now. “Are there facilities changes we need to make? Is it even possible?” To be honest, we don’t know. There has been an injunction against any coed planning for almost five years now. We need to dust off the plans and pick up where we left off. But when the injunction hit, we were only five and a half months from admitting women. We had received many excellent applications. We are eleven months away from July 2018, when the class of 2018 will arrive, so we have twice as much time left now as we did last time. This doesn’t prove that it’s possible, but it’s a hint that it might be. If we can prudently and professionally transition in 2018, then we would certainly like to!

Now it is time to restart our planning efforts. We will keep the community posted on our progress.

As Deep Springs enters its second century, we are well positioned to promote the Nunnian ideals of service and leadership in education. What an exciting time!

Dave Hitz

Chairman, Trustees of Deep Springs

We are pleased that on the eve of Deep Springs’ Centennial Celebration, the California Supreme Court has let stand the lower court ruling in support of the Trustees’ 2011 vote to admit women as students.

We are also very grateful to all of those who have devoted their time, energy, and support to achieve this result. Your steady support has been an inspiration. We greatly appreciate the efforts of the legal team which so ably represented the Trustees and the College, including lawyers and staff from Baker Manock & Jensen, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.

There are legal loose-ends ahead, and the board, staff, and students of the college will need time to discuss the most deliberate and effective path to our coeducational future. The Trustees of Deep Springs will issue a fuller public statement after the Fourth of July holiday.

 

This completes the filing cycle; the college must now wait for the California Supreme Court to decide whether or not to reconsider the Appeals Court ruling. We don’t know how long it will be before that decision is made.

2017-06-23 Objector’s Reply to Trustees

Below you can download the court documents filed since the California Appeals Court April 13, 2017 ruling in favor of the college. The College’s reply is due by June 13, 2017.

2017-05-23 Objector’s Petition for State Supreme Court Review

2017-05-08 Appeals Court Response to Objector’s Request for Publication

2017-05-02 Objectors Request to Appeals Court for Publication of Ruling as Precedent

I am happy to announce that the appeals court ruled in favor of coeducation at Deep Springs. All three Justices agreed. Their ruling is linked below.

What does this mean? Is the lawsuit done? That depends. Until May 23, 2017, the objectors have the right to petition the California Supreme Court for review. If they do, we don’t know if the court will accept the case for consideration or not.

Never trust predictions about the legal system. Delays are common. Decisions can be overturned. That said, the trustees remain hopeful. This ruling is an important step towards a coeducational Deep Springs.

Dave Hitz
Chairman, Trustees of Deep Springs

2017-04-13 Appeals Court Decision Affirming Ruling for Trust Modification

We got positive news. The Court of Appeal issued a “tentative opinion” in favor of coeducation at Deep Springs (the ruling is linked at the bottom of this message).
Courts issue tentative opinions to help lawyers on both sides focus the next round of arguments. Why waste time trying to convince the court of something it already believes? The goal is “to reduce delay and conserve judicial resources.” So this is not a final decision and does not even mean that a final ruling is near. There may be an additional round of oral arguments, and after the appeals court rules, our case could go on to the California Supreme Court.
Still, it is reassuring to see how the court is leaning so far. I remain hopeful that Deep Springs will become coeducational during its second century.
Dave Hitz
Chairman, Trustees of Deep Springs

Download the Tentative Opinion: 2017-01-06-tentative-appeals-court-ruling

 

Note added March 3, 2017: Oral Arguments have been scheduled for April 4, 2017, at 8:30 am in Riverside, California

Website design by the Deep Springs Communication Committee.